Skip to main content

"Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." (Post 3)


Many of the ideas presented in The Persuaders, a documentary on the advertising industry by Frontline PBS, both shocked me and rang alarmingly true. The line that struck me most was, "Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." As sickening as this concept is, I think we can all accept that there's truth to it.

Humans feel the need to be accepted, and when they're not receiving the validation they want from the people around them, they turn to something with which they can affiliate. This is where advertising is successful. Cults require social sacrifice and the worship of an immediately visible leader. Brands are simply more convenient. They require monetary sacrifice of a certain, specified amount, and you don't ever have to see the faces of the people whose pockets you're lining. And all the while, your affiliation with that brand gets you the social acceptance you have always longed for.

When an individual becomes affiliated with a brand to the extent that they are tracking the new releases of a company and constantly consuming so that they can remain "cool," the companies have succeeded. Loyalty beyond reason, loyalty that is so deeply ingrained in a person's mind that they have adopted a brand or company as part of their identity, is where the profit lie and companies score big.

Supreme is successful because it provides lonely, self-relenting teenagers with an outlet that makes them feel important and/or distinguished. Youtube stars are successful because the idea of a subscription gives people a crowd with which they run, even if they never see the faces of the people with whom they're affiliated. Popular culture is built on affiliation and marketing success depends on riding that wave.

While I have no conclusive answer as to how we should address this or what, if anything, needs to be done. But we should be cognizant of it. Otherwise, we will simply be pawns in the game.

Comments

  1. First of all, I really like your title as it draws the reader (well me at least) in and is relevant to your audience because the class who will be reading this has also seen the film which you are referring to. I also very much agree with your stance on this film and the different points it made. I think it's a shocking but true realization that people follow brands in a cult-like manner. I had noticed this throughout the years but had yet to put words to this action. I especially resonated with your comment about the brand Supreme because I remember in middle school when sporting that logo was so popular, even if the actual product would cost way less in any other brand. It shocked me to see how many people were willing to pay hundreds of dollars on a product that was no where near worth that in my opinion (things like sweatshirts, socks, tee-shirts). I agree as well that something should be done about this mentality, for I fear that if gone too far our society will be lost, or at least more so than it already is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Internet: The Factual Candy Store (Post 6)

The standard of truth held dear by news media organizations and American culture has been diminished and often disregarded because of the rise of the internet. That is not to say that we were ever entirely truthful. While our version of democracy has always required a certain degree of transparency and communication, we have never shied away from propaganda and smear campaigns and rose-colored depictions of our own society (except when it was inconvenient). However, the internet has given way to a whole new form of communication and unprecedented access to information. People are free to choose whose writing they read and whose version of truth they listen to because there is an overwhelming variety of options and no time to listen to all of them. And this is bad. It opens new markets. Because we want to hear what we already believe, we seem to have reached the consensus that there is no longer a need for local papers and truthful news,

Si Perfume - Giorgio Armani (Post 2)

Perfume campaigns are notoriously vague, and they often portray sexualized famous people trying to convince the commoners (us) that we will be beautiful once we smell good. This campaign, "Si by Giorgio Armani," takes a different approach. Its main message is that women should take control of their lives and just say, "SÌ." By using their perfume as a symbol of power rather than sex, they are riding the wave of feminism in popular culture and telling their viewers that women will finally have the autonomy and control we deserve the moment we walk through a cloud of their smell-fluid. Shockingly, I think this is absolute bullshit. First, the character in the commercial is very far removed from reality. The idea of freedom she embodies involves sky-diving, wearing couture in a shopping market, and stealing a man's jacket. Few sane people who would buy this perfume, i.e. their target demographic, have the money to go sky-diving, sport couture simply because the