Skip to main content

An Ode to Barbara (Post 8)

One of the people interviewed in the PBS Frontline episode "Merchants of Cool" was 13-year-old Barbara, who epitomized the impact of media on youths and youth culture. Barbara, who had grown up watching Brittany Spears and the other over-sexualized Midriffs of the world, was intent on becoming a model and looking like the women she had seen on TV. And it broke my heart.

It was horrifying that a child, a 13-year-old girl, was so moved by the image of femininity forced on her by advertising that she flew to the International Model and Talent Association's annual convention and walked on a stage to be judged by adults who wanted to use her in advertising campaigns that would further perpetuate the stereotypes she fell prey to and line their pockets with money. She beamed when she was told that she could pass for a 16 or 17-year-old, and she was told that she was a "good girl," when she said that her main goal was "success."

She wore skimpy, sexualizing outfits and put on lip gloss and danced provocatively and none of it seemed to be for her. All of if seemed like one big production, put on to satisfy others and convince them that she was "cool."

The irony of Barbara is that I was so shocked and appalled by her actions and the way she spoke, but it was all a reflection of what media has told her. And instead of being angry with the media, I was angry with her. I wanted to slap hare across the face and scream, "Snap out of it!" She seemed like a prisoner in her own mind - trapped inside by the ridiculous notion that she alone was not good enough.

In order to prevent more girls from becoming Barbaras, in order to ensure that we save them from self-delusion and pain, we have to change advertising. As long as we continue feeding girls the same things that we fed Barbara, we will end up with more girls who hate themselves and conform in order to disguise their own unhappiness. In order for the outcome to change, society must change first.

Comments

  1. BigBoiLeeviJanuary 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM

    I TOTALLY see your point and understand your frustration with the whole Barbara situation, but is it really so bad for a woman to be able to flaunt themselves in order to show themselves off. I know that you said that to you it didn't seem like the whole modelling convention did not seem for her, but what if it was for her and she truly enjoyed all of those things. I also would like to state that is it really that bad for Barbara and those other girls to be acting like that. If that is what they like to do and like to see themselves as is that really such a bad thing? Do you think that our somewhat suburban perspective influenced our opinions of the whole situation?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Si Perfume - Giorgio Armani (Post 2)

Perfume campaigns are notoriously vague, and they often portray sexualized famous people trying to convince the commoners (us) that we will be beautiful once we smell good. This campaign, "Si by Giorgio Armani," takes a different approach. Its main message is that women should take control of their lives and just say, "SÌ." By using their perfume as a symbol of power rather than sex, they are riding the wave of feminism in popular culture and telling their viewers that women will finally have the autonomy and control we deserve the moment we walk through a cloud of their smell-fluid. Shockingly, I think this is absolute bullshit. First, the character in the commercial is very far removed from reality. The idea of freedom she embodies involves sky-diving, wearing couture in a shopping market, and stealing a man's jacket. Few sane people who would buy this perfume, i.e. their target demographic, have the money to go sky-diving, sport couture simply because the
2 comments
Read more

"Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." (Post 3)

Many of the ideas presented in  The Persuaders , a documentary on the advertising industry by Frontline PBS, both shocked me and rang alarmingly true. The line that struck me most was, "Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." As sickening as this concept is, I think we can all accept that there's truth to it. Humans feel the need to be accepted, and when they're not receiving the validation they want from the people around them, they turn to something with which they can affiliate. This is where advertising is successful. Cults require social sacrifice and the worship of an immediately visible leader. Brands are simply more convenient. They require monetary sacrifice of a certain, specified amount, and you don't ever have to see the faces of the people whose pockets you're lining. And all the while, your affiliation with that brand gets you the social acceptance you have always longed for. When an individual becomes affiliated with a brand to t
1 comment
Read more

The Internet: The Factual Candy Store (Post 6)

The standard of truth held dear by news media organizations and American culture has been diminished and often disregarded because of the rise of the internet. That is not to say that we were ever entirely truthful. While our version of democracy has always required a certain degree of transparency and communication, we have never shied away from propaganda and smear campaigns and rose-colored depictions of our own society (except when it was inconvenient). However, the internet has given way to a whole new form of communication and unprecedented access to information. People are free to choose whose writing they read and whose version of truth they listen to because there is an overwhelming variety of options and no time to listen to all of them. And this is bad. It opens new markets. Because we want to hear what we already believe, we seem to have reached the consensus that there is no longer a need for local papers and truthful news,
1 comment
Read more