The Plight of the Mooks and the Midriffs (Post 7)

When we don't know who we are, we are willing to cling to and embrace the most readily available identity that we may hide our self-doubt and shame behind. As teenagers, writhing in our awkwardness and discontent, we are dangerously susceptible to this. As much as we may laugh at the Mooks and Midriffs, the exaggerated male and female archetypes as they are displayed on television, the tendency we have to submit to them is an actual threat to our self-image.

As a woman, I grew up watching television shows where pretty girls prance around and giggle and hide their intelligence for the sake of seeming nonthreatening. And if they dared to be intelligent, they were "ugly" and wore turtlenecks and didn't know how to behave around men. Dora was the only badass woman I ever saw on screen. In my teenage years, I see girls who exemplify what happens after years of suppression and emotional neglect, and I am shown that in order to be accepted, I must be thin and self-loathing and wear minimal clothing. And we as a society can all believe that the version of women and girls portrayed on screen is wrong, but that doesn't seem to be changing anything. The expectation is still that all girls will be Midriffs.

My younger brother watches television shows, and all he sees are boys that are "tough," and only do "guy things," and stomp around and shoot guns. So when he is asked to "dress nicely," or help my mom bake or read a book with a female protagonist, he giggles uncomfortably and recedes into his cave of undefined masculinity. If his friends come over, he is excessively loud and obnoxious as if to prove that he is, in fact, a male. He is growing up believing that the only way for him to behave is like a Mook.

Through the need to generate revenue and the desperate scramble to hook the attention of as many people as possible, the advertising world has created an ersatz reality in which girls are either sex objects or socially-awkward nerds and boys are wither rambunctious and sex-obsessed or "weird." And that's wrong. Because that's not the way people are. Either fortunately or unfortunately, we are all incredibly complex. Trying to shove each of us into a box leaves everyone paralyzed by claustrophobia and suffering from an identity crisis.

It is fine to have stereotypes as long as you also paint a full picture. Instead of the extremes, the Mooks and the Midriffs, there should be some variety and a more balanced picture of who and what an individual can be. And we as people have to stop buying into the Mook/Midriff narrative.

Comments

Si Perfume - Giorgio Armani (Post 2)

Perfume campaigns are notoriously vague, and they often portray sexualized famous people trying to convince the commoners (us) that we will be beautiful once we smell good. This campaign, "Si by Giorgio Armani," takes a different approach. Its main message is that women should take control of their lives and just say, "SÌ." By using their perfume as a symbol of power rather than sex, they are riding the wave of feminism in popular culture and telling their viewers that women will finally have the autonomy and control we deserve the moment we walk through a cloud of their smell-fluid. Shockingly, I think this is absolute bullshit. First, the character in the commercial is very far removed from reality. The idea of freedom she embodies involves sky-diving, wearing couture in a shopping market, and stealing a man's jacket. Few sane people who would buy this perfume, i.e. their target demographic, have the money to go sky-diving, sport couture simply because the

"Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." (Post 3)

Many of the ideas presented in The Persuaders , a documentary on the advertising industry by Frontline PBS, both shocked me and rang alarmingly true. The line that struck me most was, "Loyalty beyond reason is where the profits lie." As sickening as this concept is, I think we can all accept that there's truth to it. Humans feel the need to be accepted, and when they're not receiving the validation they want from the people around them, they turn to something with which they can affiliate. This is where advertising is successful. Cults require social sacrifice and the worship of an immediately visible leader. Brands are simply more convenient. They require monetary sacrifice of a certain, specified amount, and you don't ever have to see the faces of the people whose pockets you're lining. And all the while, your affiliation with that brand gets you the social acceptance you have always longed for. When an individual becomes affiliated with a brand to t

The Internet: The Factual Candy Store (Post 6)

The standard of truth held dear by news media organizations and American culture has been diminished and often disregarded because of the rise of the internet. That is not to say that we were ever entirely truthful. While our version of democracy has always required a certain degree of transparency and communication, we have never shied away from propaganda and smear campaigns and rose-colored depictions of our own society (except when it was inconvenient). However, the internet has given way to a whole new form of communication and unprecedented access to information. People are free to choose whose writing they read and whose version of truth they listen to because there is an overwhelming variety of options and no time to listen to all of them. And this is bad. It opens new markets. Because we want to hear what we already believe, we seem to have reached the consensus that there is no longer a need for local papers and truthful news,

Unsolicited Commentary From the Youth Perspective

Search This Blog